This week in European sciences -- week 30|2004 |
Overview Süddeutsche about monster waves. The Guardian attends a seminar on forensic science for authors. Die Zeit about the comeback of nuclear power generation. The Economist registers a renaissance in the field of supercomputing. FAZ on how to use the gravitational lens effect to determine a star's mass, also magnetic resonance microscopy for materials analysis explained. The Independent on the crucial issues of nanotech. FAZ on planet formation in the solar system. Die Zeit on European science communication and the forthcoming ESOF science festival event in Stockholm. |
|||
|
|||
On average,
two large ships sink every week, notes Huber Filser in Süddeutsche Zeitung
(July 23, 2004).
In the last 20 years about 200 supertankers or containerships sank in
heavy sea. Some of them have been possibly hit by so-called monster waves
- mysterious waves emerging unpredictably, but whose existence, after
all, was in question. Scientists with the EU project MaxWave have now
unveilled a 29.8 meter high wave by analysing data from the European radar
satellites ERS1 and 2. The goal of MaxWave
is, first, to confirm the existence and the risk of encounter of monster
waves, and to develop forecast tools. Until 2005 a global map of all encountered
monster waves is due to be published. |
|
Süddeutsche
Zeitung |
|
Humphrey
Evans addended a seminar on forensic science for writers and gives a report
in the Guardian (July
22, 2004). Writers of crime and television thrillers learn in detail
about bruises, strangulations, decaying bodies and false identifications.
The seminar was given by Allan Jamieson, director of the Forensic Institute
in Edingburg, UK. |
|
The
Guardian |
|
Nuclear Energy: Compulsion to Reconsider The comeback
of nuclear power generation on a global scale is described by Gero von
Randow in Die Zeit (July
22, 2004).
According to the international atomic energy agency (IAEA) nuclear power
generation will increase fourfold by 2050. While Germany and other countries
proclaimed to exit the business, other countries see the 'benefits', like
small greenhouse gas emissions, independence from crude oil and natural
gas imports and supplying cheap energy for an everincreasing population.
Also next generation reactors are more safe than today's. Open question
is still nuclear waste and the amount of global uranium ressources. Randows
shows the options. Having climate change and future energy shortcuts in
mind he labelled nuclear energy environmental friendly, "nuclear
energy is the best friend of fuel cells" to produce hydrogen. Hence,
he predicts that Germany and other countries soon come back to nuclear
energy. |
|
Die
Zeit |
|
Supercomputers are Getting Even More Super The Economist
notes a "renaissance in the field of supercomputing" (July
22, 2004). In the early days of (super)computing the field attracted
the best minds in computer science. Later, talents changed to the booming
Internet. But for the recent years, "the ability to build powerful
computers cheaply, combined with growing commercial demand for high-end
computing power" attracts more interest by scientists and students.
Actually, there is hard competition between genuine supercomputers that
are build from scratch or clusters of hundreds or thousands of off-the-shelf
chips (like standard PC or Apple processors). Also
there's an increasing range of supercomputer applications, from film studios
(special effects rendering), industrial company (process simulation),
biology (protein folding), climate change modelling to nuclear explosion
simulation. Some people think the limiting factors of supercomputer development
is not hardware but software, to build tools the allow and efficient programming
of all processors. The other problem is power consumption: Without a hardware
re-design, next generation supercomputers need their own power plant. |
|
The
Economist |
|
First Sun Weighted by a Gravitational Lens In general, astrophysicists determine the mass of celestial objects, planets, stars or even galaxies by Newton's and Kepler's laws. Hermann Michael Hahn now explains in FAZ (July 21, 2004) how scientists measured first time the mass of a star which is about 2000 light years away by using a micro-gravitational lens effect. By occation, a 'near' star passes by a farer one and bends according to Einstein's general theory of relativity the light similar to a lens. Using this micro-gravitational lens effect and computer modelling scientists figured out the mass of the nearer star to a tens of the mass of our sun. Interesting is that the result based on date taken in the year 1993 which were obtained during a sky survey. Probing Dancing Electrons Physicists
combined the well-known methods of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (M.R.I.,
generally used in medicine to probe the human body on the sub-millimeter
scale) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM, to scan the surface of materials
on an atomic level) to a technique to dive into materials and uncover
their properties underneath the surface on a nanometer scale. Manfred
Lindinger describes in FAZ (July
21, 2004) how it works. The method is sensitive to the magnetic properties
of the material, especially the magnetic spin moments of electrons. |
|
Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung |
|
How to Involve the Public into the Nanotech Debate? Lewis Wopert,
professor of biology at UCL, London, comments on the nanotech debate stirred
up recently by Prince Charles (July
21, 2004).
First, he recognized the precautionary principle, and that we should be
concerned of potential environmental dangers of nanotech. Then, there
is a deficiency in knowledge of the behaviour of nanoparticles in the
human body and in the environment. But all questions might be answered
by proper scientific investigation - having asbostos and GM lessons learn.
The unkown factor is the reaction of the public, and the open question:
"How can the technology be controlled and the public be informed?
This is a crucial and difficult issue that, in spite of past experience
with GM foods, is still not solved. How to involve the public, and how
to avoid groups with special interests dominating, is still very unclear."
|
|
The
Independent |
|
Manfred
Lindinger reports in FAZ (July
19, 2004) on modelling of planet formation. Our sun is about 5 billion
years old, the earth 4.6 billion years: well, there's not much time for
the formation of planets out of the solar dust. Researchers study with
computer models and experiments in space how tiny particles of the size
of some micrometers collide and aggregate in vaccum. At present, simulation
data and experimental result doesn't fit well. Filmed in real situation
the particles stick
much faster together than in the simulation. |
|
Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung |
|
European Science Festival in Stockholm Any work
on a European level tackles many difficulties and obstacles caused by
the multi-fragmented, multi-national and multi-lingual nature of its subject.
The European Commission directs on a more official way, for instance,
by establishing a European Research Counsil and a European Research Areal,
whereas other groups go a more informal way, for instance, the Euroscience
organisation or science foundations in the different member states. Euroscience
(www.euroscience.org)
which is an interest group of scientists out of Europe and two prominent
science foundations, the Volkswagen Foundation and the Bosch Foundation
(both Germany) perform a big science festival event in Stockholm in late
August (ESOF2004).
Ulrich Schnabel speaks in Die Zeit (July
15, 2004) with the programme managers of both foundations. |
|
Die
Zeit |
Feedback |
We are glad to receive your comments! Send us an e-mail | subscribe | unsubscribe |